Good Supervisor, Good Person – Employee Problem

by Shaun on Friday, November 13, 2009

Begin with a situation that happens all the time: for whatever reason, an employee has trouble managing his or her feelings, it spills out, and begins affecting customer service.

You’re the supervisor.

Like any supervisor, you were looking forward to teamwork, cooperation, creativity, mutual support, and you were hoping you’d hardly ever have an unpleasant conversation with an employee, let alone have to fire anyone.

It’s hard because most new supervisors hate to ”pull rank,” or be seen as the type who needs or enjoys exercising “power.”  Some newbies worry that ever having to assert authority will be seen as a kind of failure that says bad things about their managerial skills.

Despite those hopes, there’s no getting around it – something is occurring, and a basic workplace axiom is: if you think there’s a problem, you’re right.

So what now? Of course, you should be careful, want to get it right, certainly not make anything worse. And that’s the obvious reason you don’t want to just stumble into an unplanned conversation, loaded with bits of data and pieces of facts, and filled with strong emotions – running both ways.  Avoid that at all costs.

So, yes it’s good not to jump the gun, but that can run you right into another axiom – and this one is thoroughly road tested: good managers head toward problems, they don’t look away.

Despite what you may have heard, problems rarely just work themselves out in today’s workplaces.  So please don’t be passive.  The employees are watching.

Workplaces are mini-cultures.  The employees assume a supervisor knows what’s going on unless he or she doesn’t want to know.  Everyone’s looking to see how you handle the situation – and yourself.  Mostly they’re rooting for an outcome without turmoil and hard feelings, but they know that’s not always realistic.

Assume you’ll be nervous, but don’t worry about it. You don’t have to be perfect.  Take some time to prepare.  Be composed.  Never go into a meeting angry.  Remember, it’s not about you, and you haven’t been let down personally.  You’re having the conversation because a problem has been identified, and you’re responsible for the “work product” coming from your area.  It’s about the work.

So, it’s your meeting. The door is closed, obviously.  You’re not rude, the tone is friendly and civil, but there’s no need for chit-chat. Get right to the reason why you’re both there.  The most important thing is to state clearly what the problem is – work performance.

Use simple, clear language, give concrete examples, and explain what makes it a problem. Give the employee a chance to respond, but not to argue or filibuster. You want to be crystal clear about what improved performance will look like, and then give a reasonable timeframe for it to occur.   It’s very important to convey that you want the employee to succeed, but you do that best by being clear about what you need.  Wrap up the meeting, assuring the employee that there will be both help and follow-up.

That follow-up is crucial.  If employees see that you’re around, aware of what’s happening, head toward problems, but they also know that your first instinct is to support and be helpful, it makes addressing workplace problems much, much easier.

Nice people can be great supervisors.  It’s all going to be OK.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Sudhir Mathew November 19, 2009 at 8:24 pm

Hi Shaun,
I think you got this right. It is important for th supervisor to take action because employees are watching and inappropriate behavior does not change automatically. Being fully prepared and getting the message across with clear indications of what improved performance will look like is crucial. It is important for the supervisor to support the employee along the way in improving performance. This could be providing resources, training or regular feedback so the employee knows whether he is on the right track. Managers’ primary and most important mission should be to ensure the success of their employees.

Thanks for your article.

shaun December 7, 2009 at 3:47 pm

Thanks for your comment, Sudhir.

Micromanaging is one kind of problem, and passivity is the opposite problem. Many managers have been legitimately “burned” from taking either position. The key lesson is to not learn the “wrong” lesson by overreacting and swinging to the other side.

Every manager hears “help your employees succeed.” Of course it’s the right message, but what that means exactly in any given situation is precisely where the rubber hits the road.

Helping an employee is not charity, or social work, it’s a crucial managerial function embedded in the culture of a healthy workplace. Employees can feel it when it’s real. It pays huge dividends over time, plus – if it finally must happen – it makes having to end someone’s employment much cleaner and less painful all around.

Thanks again for commenting.

Shaun

Leave a Comment